- 100 Top Hospitals and Peer Hospitals Experience Biggest
Drop in Profits Since Study Started in 1993
- Top Hospitals Outperform Peers Under Adverse Industry Conditions
- Percentage of 100 Top Hospitals In Northeast Nearly Doubles From
1999
EVANSTON, Ill. (December 11, 2000) The HCIA-Sachs
Institute today released the findings of the eighth annual 100 Top
Hospitals™ Benchmarks for Success study, which recognizes the nation's
hospitals that have achieved excellence in quality of care, efficiency
of operations and sustainability of overall performance.
The study found that industry-wide, hospitals experienced the
biggest drop in profits since the study was first conducted in 1993.
In spite of this fact, the 100 Top benchmark hospitals maintained
significantly higher profitability than their peers, treated more
difficult cases and achieved better overall outcomes. If all U.S.
acute hospitals were to perform at the level of the 100 Top benchmark
hospitals, expenses would decline an estimated $12 billion, resulting
in lower health care costs and savings to Americans.
The study is based solely on objective, quantitative performance
data that are consistent and complete across all U.S. hospitals, which
were analyzed in groups based on size and teaching status.
"This year's study reflects the financial distress hospitals
have encountered in the wake of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997,"
said Jean Chenoweth, executive director of the HCIA-Sachs Institute.
"Despite the difficulties facing them, the 100 Top benchmark
hospitals have maintained profitability and top clinical performance.
This year's 100 Top Hospitals study truly highlights those
institutions with superior management teams who can perform well under
very adverse conditions while providing high-quality care to their
communities on a consistent basis."
Highlights of the study's findings include:
- The 100 Top benchmark hospitals were found to have fewer
complications and inpatient deaths than other hospitals. Quality
of care as measured by mortality and complications indices was an
average of 14 percent better at the 100 Top benchmark hospitals.
- Despite an increasingly acute patient population, use of more
expensive services, and lower Medicare reimbursement rates paid to
all hospitals under the Balanced Budget Act, benchmark hospitals
exhibited more than three times the profitability of all other
hospitals studied.
- The study revealed a regional disparity in performance, most
notably in the number of top hospitals in the South (37) versus
the Northeast (15). However, the number of top hospitals in the
Northeast increased by the highest percentage of any region,
nearly doubling since last year's study. The results show there is
variability in the levels of hospital performance caused by
competition, managed care and regulation.
- Benchmark hospitals also paid higher wages but employed fewer
staff than peer hospitals.
- Benchmark hospitals had a median Total Profit Margin of 8.71
percent and a median Cash Flow Margin of 16.44 percent, compared
with only 1.88 percent and 9.69 percent respectively for peer
hospitals. These findings are the weakest since the study was
first conducted in 1993.
Only one hospital in the nation, Brigham & Women's Hospital in
Boston, has been selected as a benchmark hospital all eight years the
study has been conducted. Sixty-three percent of this year's benchmark
hospitals have been named to the list more than once. Of those, more
than half have performed at benchmark levels for at least four years.
Study excerpts will be made available on http://www.100TopHospitals.com.
Full copies of the 2000 100 Top Hospitals: Benchmarks for
Success study are available for purchase on the Web site or by calling
Customer Service at 1-800-568-3282.
The study analyzes the nation's hospitals using empirical
performance data from the Medicare MedPAR aggregated claims database
and other publicly available sources. This methodology ensures that
the focus is on statistical rather than anecdotal evidence of top
performance. The measures for the 2000 study stress quality of care,
efficiency of operations and sustainability of overall performance,
and are calculated for five classes of hospitals:
- Major Teaching - 15 hospitals
- Teaching with less than 400 Beds - 25 hospitals
- Large Community, 250+ Beds - 20 hospitals
- Medium Community, 100 to 250 Beds - 20 hospitals
- Small Community, 25 to 99 Beds - 20 hospitals
Seven overall measures were used to determine performance:
risk-adjusted mortality index, risk-adjusted complications index,
severity-adjusted average length of stay, expense per adjusted
discharge, profitability, proportion of outpatient revenue, and
productivity (total asset turnover ratio). All of the criteria were
weighted equally in the evaluation process.
About HCIA-Sachs: The HCIA-Sachs Institute is the research and
education division of HCIA-Sachs. The Institute is dedicated to the
improvement of the health care industry through improved information.
The Institute produces 100 Top Hospitals and Clinical Research Program
studies, and publishes white papers - authoritative research reports,
often clinical or financial - that explore the impact of legislation,
new technologies, and clinical breakthroughs on the health care
industry.
Clinical Research Program studies are dedicated to identifying the
treatment patterns of 100 Top Hospitals award winners. The Institute
produces clinical research studies, in conjunction with its Advisory
Board, to improve clinical quality and delivery of care while
providing education to the health care community. In 2001, HCIA-Sachs
will be doing business as Solucient.
Editors Note: Additional information can be found at http://www.100tophospitals.com
under media information.
CONTACTS:
Media:
Tim Paul
Schneider Integrated for HCIA-Sachs
(212) 402-5455 ext. 106
tim@schneiderintegrated.com
Stacey Whitaker
Schneider Integrated for HCIA-Sachs
(212) 402-5455 ext. 122
stacey@schneiderintegrated.com
Providers:
Jean Chenoweth
HCIA-Sachs Institute
(734) 669-7941
jchenoweth@solucient.com
###